2008/9/26

Labor unions protest in NY against bailout

Christian Wiessner

Reuters

Sep 26, 2008



NEW YORK (Reuters) - Hard hats, transit workers, machinists, teachers and other labor unionists railed against the U.S. government's proposed bailout of Wall Street on Thursday in a protest steps from the New York Stock Exchange.

Several hundred protesters yelled their enthusiastic support as union leaders decried a proposed $700 billion plan aimed at reinvigorating the credit markets by relieving financial institutions of distressed debt.

"The Bush administration wants us to pay the freight for a Wall Street bailout that does not even begin to address the roots of our crisis," said AFL-CIO National President John Sweeney.

"We want our tax dollars used to provide a hand up for the millions of working people who live on Main Street and not a handout to a privileged band of overpaid executives."


Signs read "No Blank Checks For Wall Street" and "Our Hard-Earned Pensions Are Not Up For Grabs." Protesters cheered repeated calls for the government to spend money on education, health care and housing as freely and readily as it was proposing to do for Wall Street.

"We know that the economic situation has to be solved. But we want a responsible rescue, not an opportunistic bailout," said United Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten.

"And that means, just like every single boss says to me, that there should be accountability for the teachers, then there should be accountability for Wall Street," he said.

"The bailout is a sellout unless it includes the victims of the tyranny," civil rights activist the Rev. Jesse Jackson told reporters after the rally. "The homeowners need long-term, low interest rate loans and the restructuring of loans, not the repossession of homes."

"This is a Roosevelt moment," Jackson said, referring to former President Franklin D. Roosevelt's program to lift the United States out of the Great Depression. "It's time for reconstruction of manufacturing law, trade law and banking transparency."

(Editing by Daniel Trotta)


2008/9/25

Call to an International Meeting of Solidarity with Boliva

Santa Cruz, Bolivia, October 23-25, 2008


THOSE WHO STAND WITH BOLIVIA, STAND FOR ALL PEOPLE, ALL THE TIME!

1. The dignified inhabitants of this Abya Yala (American) continent have been struggling for centuries to re-establish SUMAK KAWSAY (Living Fully) that was seized from us by the invaders and subsequent colonizers.

Throughout the ages they have murdered worthy leaders, usurped the wealth of the people and at the height of their greed, violated all human rights and those of Pachamama [Mother Earth], aided and abetted by members of the religious hierarchies who forged accords with the political and economic power in each historical period.

2. After 516 years, the neo-invaders and conquistadores seek to abort the libertarian rebirth in Latin America, and so the descendants of the murderers and usurpers return with their neoliberal policies, provoking new genocides and larcenies.

3. North American imperialism and its allies within the Latin American oligarchy are trying to halt the liberation processes in countries such as Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Nicaragua, among others; and so the oppressors shed their sheep's clothing in order to fully display their predatory wolves' fangs, ready to save their outdated political, social, economic and cultural system by any means necessary. Bolivia is now the target of the largest offensive by these sectors who believe themselves to be owners and lords of the world, intending to permanently appropriate for themselves the water, gas, oil, and land that belong to the Bolivian people.

4. In Bolivia, the groups that make up the so-called "Half-Moon," which are fascist civic-prefectural groups, descendants of those who served Hitler in his deathly project and following their defeat in the Second World War, fled to various countries, Bolivia among them, are unable to comprehend that the time has come for stolen property to be returned to its legitimate owners.

They cannot bear that in Bolivia, for the first time in Latin American history, with more than 53% of the vote, the people chose the Aymara brother, Evo Morales Ayma as their president; an heir to the rebellion of Tupac Katari, Bartolina Sisa, Tupak Amaru and Che Guevara; a man born of Pachamama and forged in the social insurgency lit by the millennial fire of the sacred COCA leaf; who called a new Constituent Assembly and won all battles cleanly and with dignity; who struggles for a true Agrarian Reform in a country where more than 80% of the population is impoverished, and who was ratified as President of the Republic by 67% in a referendum held August 10th; who nationalized strategic resources such as oil and natural gas; who implemented social measures in solidarity, in order to favor the least protected; who with a dignified attitude expelled the United States Ambassador in La Paz, Philip Goldberg, for conspiring against Bolivia's sovereignty and refusing to respect the people's right to self-determination; among other measures that demonstrate his unwavering commitment to serve the people who now ratify him as President.

5. These anti-democratic sectors, finding themselves defeated and in the middle of complete desperation to maintain their privileges, began a divisive plan of autonomy for Santa Cruz, Tarija, Beni, Pando, and with the help of a terrorist group called the "juventud cruceñista " [Santa Cruz Youth Union] are implementing a new phase of their COUP PLAN, by the taking of public institutions, and in an effort to destabilize the legitimate government of Evo Morales, SLAUGHTERED AND KILLED scores of unarmed indigenous and peasants in Porvenir (Pando), the very same who through their struggle have been added to the thousands of heroes and martyrs who have offered their lives for the ultimate recovery of Sumak Kawsay on our continent.

6. Faced with these situations, in the name of Pachamama's loving and rebellious cry for justice, of the dignified women and men who aspire to leave our sons and daughters a planet where we might live in universal brotherhood, through the exercise of the right to a dignified life, the right to self-determination for the people, and respect for inter-cultural and multinational coexistence; for a just and fraternal world, we call on all organizations of indigenous, Afro-Americans, peasants, workers, women, social movements, students, networks, intellectuals, personalities, friends of revolutionary causes, to the INTERNATIONAL MEETING OF SOLIDARITY WITH BOLIVIA, to be held on October 23 and 25 in Santa Cruz, Bolivia, in order to unite our forces and hearts, and testify together to the world that BOLIVIA DOES NOT STRUGGLE ALONE.

That is why we join with President Evo Morales and endorse his words:

"Many times I will be wrong, who isn't once in awhile? But in the struggle against neoliberal colonization, I will never be wrong, I will never betray them." (Evo Morales, Umala, May 3rd, 2008)

CONVOCATION

* Confederacion de Pueblos de la Nacionalidad Kichwa del Ecuador (ECUARUNARI) - Ecuador
[Confederation of People of Kichwa Nationality from Ecuador (ECUARUNARI) - Ecuador]

* Confederaci?n de Nacionalidades Ind?genas del Ecuador (CONAIE) - Ecuador
[Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador (CONAIE) - Ecuador]

* Organizacion Nacional Indigena de Colombia (ONIC) - Colombia
[National Indigenous Organization of Colombia (ONIC) - Colombia]

* Consejo de Todas las Tierras - Chile
[Council of All Lands - Chile]

* Movimiento Sin Tierra (MST) - Brasil
[Landless Movement (MST) - Brazil]

* Via Campesina - Brasil
[Campesina Way - Brazil]

* Tlaxcala, the Network of Translators for Linguistic Diversity

2008/9/18

European MPs Appeal : No more Pinochets in Latin America

On the 35th anniversary of the military overthrow of Salvador Allende in Chile in 1973, which had the overt support of the United States, the presidents of Bolivia and Venezuela asked the US ambassadors accredited to their countries to leave.

They both believe they have faced the possibility of imminent coups in which they accuse the United States' administration of being involved.

A third country, Paraguay, announced ten days previously that they had detected a conspiracy involving military officers and opposition politicians.

Latin America now faces its most serious crisis since the re-introduction of democracy at the end of the 20th century.

The plot against democracy in Venezuela centred on a conspiracy, revealed in telephone conversations between senior military officers broadcast on national television, to assassinate the democratically elected head of state, President Chavez.

In Bolivia, the separatist governors of the five eastern regions, in close touch with the US embassy in La Paz, have begun a campaign of violence and economic sabotage designed to create the conditions for a coup.

These events demonstrate unequivocally who defends democracy and who threatens it in Latin America today.

We are appalled by the failure of much of the international media to provide accurate and proportionate coverage of these events.

We call upon democrats throughout the world to rally to defend democracy, social progress and national independence in Latin America and to condemn these conspiracies against democracy and human rights.

We call upon the European Union and European governments to adopt a policy independent of the Bush administration in the US and unequivocally condemn all attempts to overthrow democratically elected governments in Latin America.

Richard Gott

Ken Livingstone

John Pilger

Hugh O'Shaughnessy

Colin Burgon MP

Tony Benn

Diane Abbott MP

Jeremy Corbyn MP

Ian Gibson MP

Colin Challen MP

Jim Devine MP

Rob Marris MP

Michael Connarty MP

Mark Fisher MP

David Taylor MP

Ian Davidson MP

Baroness Gibson

Chris McLaughlin, Editor Tribune

Alexander Ulrich MP, Germany

Jörn Wunderlich MP, Germany

Heike Hänsel MP, Germany

Kornelia Möller MP, Germany

Elke Reinke MP, Germany

Inge Höger MP¸Germany,

Helmut Scholz, Die Linke

Ilda Figueiredo MEP, Portugal

Pedro Guerreiro MEP, Portugal

Manuel Talens, Spain

Pascual Serrano, Spain

Isaac Rosa, Spain

Carlos Tena:, Spain

2008/9/16

South American leaders back president of Bolivia

Agence France-Presse,

September 16, 2008

SOUTH American presidents holding a crisis summit here over unrest in Bolivia issued a strong statement giving Bolivian President Evo Morales their support.

The statement agreed by Morales and the presidents of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela also rejected any break-up of Bolivia's territory (see below).

The nine presidents in the Chilean capital Santiago expressed "their full and firm support for the constitutional government of President Evo Morales, whose mandate was ratified by a big majority."

Argentine President Cristina Kirchner said after the six hours of talks that "the agreement was unanimous."

She had called the summit under the auspices of the newly formed Union of South American Nations, which is currently presided over by Chile.

The leaders also said they were looking at creating a committee to attend talks between Morales's Government and rebel governors in Bolivia's east opposing his socialist reforms.

Bolivia last week was gripped by violent unrest that left at least 18 people dead and a hundred wounded in the northern state of Pando.

The disturbances occurred in five eastern states whose conservative governors are seeking autonomy.

Mr Morales has called their push an illegal attempt at secession.

On arrival in Santiago, he accused his foes at home of mounting a "civic coup d'etat" against him.

The summit statement said the presidents "warn that our respective government energetically reject and will not recognize any situation that attempts a civil coup and the rupture of institutional order and which could compromise the territorial integrity of the Republic of Bolivia."

They also condemned the deaths in Pando and called for a commission to investigate allegations many of the victims were pro-Morales peasants gunned down in an ambush.

***** ***** *****

UNASUR declaration on Bolivia

Santiago de Chile, September 15 2008

The heads of state and the government of Unasur, meeting in the Palace of the Moneda, Santiago de Chile, September 15 2008, with the purpose of considering the situation in the Republic of Bolivia and remembering the tragic episodes 35 years ago in this very place that shocked all humanity:

Considering the the constitutive treaty of Unasur, signed in Brasilia on May 23rd 2008, enshrines the principles of unrestricted respect for sovereignty, of the non-interference in internal affairs, of the integrity and inviolbility of territory, of democracy and its institutions and the unrestricted respect of human rights;

Faced with the grave occurances reported in the sister Republic of Bolivia, and in favour of the strengthening of political dialogue and cooperation for the strengthening of citizen's security, the countries that make up Unasur express:

1. Their fullest and decided support for the constitutional government of President Evo Morales, whose mandate was ratified by a wide margin in the recent referendum.

2. They warn that its respective governments energetically reject and do not recognize any situation that implies an intent of civil coup d'etat, the rupture of institutional order, or that compromises the territorial integrity of the Republic of Bolivia

3. Consequent to the above, and in consideration of the grave situation that affects the sister Republic of Bolivia, they condemn the attack on government installations and public forces by groups that look for the destabilization of Bolivia's democracy, and demand the prompt return of those installations as condition for the start of the dialogue process.

4. At the same time, they call for all political and social actors involved to take the necessary measures so that acts of violence, intimidation, attacks on the democratic institutionality and estabished judicial order cease immediately.

5. In this context, they express the firmest condemnation of the massacre that took place in the department of Pando, and support the call made by the Bolivian government for a Unasur commission to be set up in this brother country to impartially investigate and report this lamentable occurance as soon as possible, and to formulate recommendations in such a way that it is not left unpunished.

6. They ask all members of Bolivian society to preserve national unity and the territorial integrity of that country, basic fundamentals of any State, and to reject any intent to undermine those principles.

7. They call for dialogue to establish the conditions that will permit the present situation to be overcome, and create the search for a sustainable solution, under full respect of the state of curfew and the current legal order.

8. In this respect, the Presidents of Unasur agree to create a commission open to all members, coordinated by the Pro-tempore Presidency, to accompany the tasks of the the dialogues conducted by the legitimate government of Bolivia

9. They will create a support and assistance commission to the government of Bolivia, in function to its requirements and including specialist human resources.

[Translated by Inca Kola News]

The ultra right is preparing a real genocide in Bolivia

Hugo Moldiz

(Hugo Moldiz is a MAS leader and the head of the General Staff of the Peoples, which unites most of Bolivia’s social movements.)

The fascist onslaught, foreseeable in the coming week, by the ultra right and their paramilitary groups, armed with automatic rifles, FALs and AKs, will be a real test of the level of consciousness and organisation of the people, the loyalty of the High Command of the Armed Forces, some of whom have tight links with the Pentagon, and the strength of the revolution.

The tears and anger erupted across the country. Pando was the scene of the largest massacre that Bolivia has witnessed in the last 50 years and the state of siege, declared by President Evo Morales last Friday, is the opportunity, perhaps the only one, if the soldiers do not switch sides, to save the unity of the homeland and the revolution, and above all to avoid an even larger massacre being registered in the following days.

Bolivia is going against the clock. The civic committees, the political organisation form of the dominant classes that lack a party, and the paramilitary groups organised over the last 2 years, are finalising details for the “final confrontation” as the prefect of Tarija, Mario Cossio, warned about only minutes before beginning a meeting with the government last Friday afternoon in representation of the opposition bloc.

All available information, obviously silenced by the mass media, leads us to think that between Monday and Wednesday, although it cannot be ruled out that it may happen before, these paramilitary groups, armed as we have seen with FALs and even AK machine guns, will launch themselves against the zones with presence of MAS militants and social movements.

The leaders and social movements know that the deadline approaches with the passing of each day. There is no lack of wanting and decisiveness either. What is clear is that these men and women do not have weapons to confront the paramilitaries, as a peasant from Pando said impotently on Sunday morning, after miraculously escaping from the raid that the paramilitaries carried out, leaving up to now 35 dead.

The relative calm on Sunday is like those that precedes the days of big storms. President Evo Morales, who personally heads the preparations for resistance against what he has defined as a “civil-prefectural coup”, is profoundly conscious of what is coming and in front of millions of peasants in Cochabamba on Saturday reiterated that it is preferable to die for the homeland before betraying the struggle of the people. The words of the indigenous, revolutionary leader and head of state were not a demagogic attempt to reap applause, but rather an call to the conscience and heart in the moments of a final battle that approaches and on which will depend the future of the Bolivian revolution and in part the course of the Latin American revolution.

Goldberg has been expelled, but imperialism’s plans continue. In the week just gone by, several of his operators have dedicated themselves to knocking on the doors of the Military High Command to ask them to pay back past debts. The maximum Commander of the Armed Forces, Luis Trigo, who asked authorisation to work as co-pilot of Jorge Tuto Quiroga in the electoral campaign last December, maintains direct relations with the bourgeois of the department of Santa Cruz and has business interests in the United States. It is not even worth talking about [Commander of the Military Freddy] Macay, he was always the Pentagon’s man in the Armed Forces, his brother works in an office in charge of security issues in the US embassy in La Paz, as does his cousin.

The Eight Division of the Army in Santa Cruz, led by General Bracamonte, is strategic for the conspiratorial and coup plotting plans of imperialism and the right. The information available up to now is not encouraging for the government. At the beginning of the week, a private meeting between this military leader and the seditious Ruben Costas and Branco Marinkovic, where Gary Prado (the soldier who captured Che) also participated, finished with the commitment of the general to not act against the population or, what is basically the same: do nothing against the paramilitary groups that act with impunity in this department, the epicentre of the counter revolution.

The only thing that has stopped this kind off “sit down strike of the Bolivian Armed Forces” denounced by the Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez from growing over to openly coup plotting measures against the government is the patriotic position of the other high level soldiers and the support that President Morales has amongst sub officials, classes and troops.

Time is running out. The hope that international pressure can help put an end to the violence against the people is minimal. Unasur, the UN and the OAS can pronouncement themselves in favour of dialogue, but it is highly unlikely that the ultra right will deactivate their plans, just as they didn’t in the organisation of their referendums on the autonomy statutes that the National Electoral Court declared illegal. Today the panorama is worse and the deaths and injuries send out signals that they are not contemplating taking a backward step.

It is not a lack of finance that is pushing the ultra right to maintain the state of convulsion, given that that a fund of no less than $12 million would have been built up with the support of the United States and ex-president Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada, who today is seeking refuge in the country to the north, but rather the certainty the longer this drags out, the bigger will be the national and international reaction that is activated against them.

And that is the key. The only thing that remains is the confidence that there is no weapon more powerful than the consciousness and the organisation of the people, and that this 67% of support for the government convert itself into an active majority and not a passive one as it has been up until now.

[Translated from La Epoca]

Oppose the fascist coup in Bolivia!

(Sign the petition)


Dear comrades and friends,

You will be aware of the US-backed "civic coup" underway in the Bolivia, and the threats this poses to democracy and all nations' right to political, economic and social sovereignty.

We urge you/your organisation to sign the open petition we have initiated in support of President Evo Morales and the Bolivian people, and to circulate it widely among left and progressive individuals and activists.

We hope you may also be able to use the petition to bring pressure on the government of your own country to publicly state its support for Bolivia's right to freedom from imperialist intervention.

The petition is at:

http://www.gopetition.com/online/21871.html

BOLIVIA: the Massacre in Porvenir

Luigino Bracci Roa,

with dispatches from the Bolivian agencies ABI and ERBOL

Last Thursday, a thousand peasants marched toward Cobija to protest the violence driven by the Prefect Leopoldo Fernández, when they were ambushed on a bridge located 7 kilometers from the town of Porvenir, in the department of Pando. This was the scene of a massacre, executed by civilian groups who'd received weapons training by the government of Leopoldo Fernández.

Initially on Thursday there were 8 deaths reported. The figure was rising steadily, to 9 dead, then 14, later 15. This Saturday evening, the government minister Alfredo Rada confirmed that there were 30 dead. But other officials fear the figure could reach 50 or even 70.

The lack of exactness in the figures is due to the fact that the Prefect Fernández and the armed gangs he commanded prevented the arrival of humanitarian organizations at the scene of the massacre. The government declared a state of siege last Friday, after the soldier Ramiro Tañini Alvarado was killed by .22 caliber gunfire, when civilian groups faced off against the military over control of Pando’s airport.

Prefect Fernández had insisted that what took place on Thursday had to do with an armed confrontation “initiated” by the national Bolivian government. The facts contradicted him. Roberto Tito, one of the rural workers who was at the bridge when the shooting began against defenseless people, bore witness that they’d marched unarmed, but right away they heard the shots and some people began to fall, mortally wounded.

Snipers located in the upper reaches of the trees shot toward the crowd without considering that children and women were mixed in with the peasants, whose only weapons were sticks and machetes.

We were unarmed, contrary to what they said. They stopped us some seven kilometers before Porvenir and afterwards they attacked us when we reached the bridge, where they ambushed us and began to shoot with automatic machine-guns,” said Tito, sorrowful over the deaths of at least 10 of his comrades, now that since Friday an undetermined number of missing have been reported.

The comrades had to escape wherever they could. They didn’t spare even the children or the women. It was a massacre of the peasants; it’s something that we must not allow,” said the rural worker.

Tito’s testimony is backed by the version of Senator Abraham Cuellar, who insisted that at the height of the Bridge of Cachuelita, there was a gap 10 meters wide and deep so that neither trucks nor people could pass. It was in these circumstances that the shooting began.

The people were walking on foot, there had been an ambush prepared by the Prefecture, planned with military weaponry and with the regrettable result that there were many deaths on the side of the peasants and the majority are from jurisdictions governed by mayors that are not associated with MAS [Movement Toward Socialism] but rather with organizations that support the government,” said Cuellar.

Fernández Had Been Denounced Since 2006 For Training ParamilitariesAs far back as September, 2006, the then Government Minister Alicia Muñoz denounced the Prefect Leopoldo Fernández for training at least a hundred paramilitaries in Cobija, under the pretense of forming a “citizen’s protection” force. Although Fernández denied the veracity of this denunciation, for which Muñoz had photos and videotape proof, the head of Citizens’ Security for the Pando Prefecture, Alberto Murakami, admitted to the training of civilians.

Murakami claimed at the time that it was a hundred “neighbors” trained to perform monitoring, in the face of “delinquency” and a “deficit of policemen.” Muñoz made the denunciation as proof that the opposition prefects were not acting as legitimately as they insisted. Time and the massacre of defenseless people, regrettably proved the ex-Minister correct.

Escape to the Bushes

In the middle of the massacre, the peasants had only one alternative to save their lives, and they ran for the bushes while the paramilitaries unloaded their weapons on the crowd. “They are people from the Prefecture and the Departmental Roads Service who are well armed with machine-guns and snipers, because they shot freely at us from the treetops,” said Tito.

The peasant leader’s denunciation was corroborated by Senator Abraham Cuellar, who said that this Friday, 24 hours after the massacre, the paramilitary persecution of the Pando peasants continued. “We know that the persecution has been relentless in Filadelfia and Cachuelita, which are provinces surrounding Cobija; the killings continue, they are continuing to murder people, unarmed people,” said the legislator.

He accused assassins hired by the Pando authorities, who go about armed with automatic weapons, something which has forced at least a hundred people to cross the border into Brazil to seek refuge.

In this context, the mobilization of people from the Prefecture, Sedcam, assassins and paramilitaries hired by Prefect Fernández, supposedly to reclaim a redirection of 30 percent of the resources from a Direct Tax on Hydrocarbons, was the cover for mounting a tough repression.

106 missing since Thursday massacre in Porvenir

Bolivian agencies ABI and ERBOL

Cobija (ABI). - A humanitarian commission, headed by the Presidential Minister Juan Ramón Quintana and Health Minister, Ramiro Tapia, arrived at 5 p.m. this Sunday in Porvenir, Filadelfia, Puerto Rico and other conflict areas to undertake a search for missing people and attend to the wounded, victims of a massacre executed by hired assassins sponsored by Pando’s prefecture.

The commission, previously in Cobija, inspected the health centers, above all, Hospital Roberto Galindo, to evaluate the wounded. After visiting the wounded and receiving a clinical report from the directors of these centers, the Health Minister, Ramiro Tapia, assured that all those who were part of the massacre at Porvenir are receiving medical attention.

To evacuate dead and wounded, three ambulances are making the rounds of Porvenir, Filadelfia, Puerto Rico and other communities. The situations of the people or bodies recovered from all these areas will be analyzed in order to bring them to La Paz or to Cobija.

The President has asked us to assist with the humanitarian support for people who are missing, wounded and have not had the necessary support,” said Minister Tapia. The governmental humanitarian aid commission arrived this Saturday at 2:00 a.m. at the “Aníbal Arab” airport in Cobija, headed by the Presidential and Health ministers in order to begin the work of helping and searching for missing peasants.

106 Missing

The Peasant Workers’ Federation of Pando reported that there are 25 dead and 25 wounded as well as 106 people missing after last Thursday’s brutal massacre in the town of El Porvenir.

The leader Luis Adolfo Mayar, in statements to the Erbol Network, reported that nine dead had been identified, while 16 were still not claimed by their families. According to the government, the number of dead is at 30, since in recent hours additional bodies of peasants were found in the bushes and rivers of the area where the slaughter took place.

In all, the wounded presently total 25, but it is possible that in the next few hours the number could increase, since many people fearful of being victimized, can be found hiding in the houses of family or friends, said the leader.

Mayar said that 106 people are missing, a number that continues to increase as time goes by and reports continue to come in to the peasant communities about people who still have not returned to their homes.

Bolivian military forces finally took control of Cobija, capital of Pando Department, but they have not apprehended the prefect, Leopoldo Fernández, whose detention was ordered on Saturday. It’s feared that the final number of those killed in last Thursday’s massacre may be much higher.

Early this morning the Bolivian Armed Forces took complete control of the city of Cobija, capital of Pando Department, where a state of siege had been declared last Friday after an ambush and slaughter that took the lives of many peasants.

The first unofficial reports indicated that armed separatist groups who controlled the city, at the command of Pando’s prefect, Leopoldo Fernández, did not offer much resistance. The operation took place between one and two in the morning today, September 14.

The first reports from the Erbol Network indicated that the military operation has taken control of practically the entire city and that shortly a commission will head for Porvenir where the massacre of peasants took place last Thursday. Until now, Pando’s prefect, and the armed civilian groups that he commanded had obstructed the entry of humanitarian organizations to the scene, and while initial reports mentioned 8 deaths, the figure has increased as the days have gone by.

According to the first reports of certain authorities, there were no casualties among the Armed Forces this Sunday. Last Friday evening, the soldier Ramiro Tañini Alvarado was killed, a shooting victim when the military forces faced off against armed civilian groups who were holding the Cobija airport.

Carnage

On Saturday evening, the government minister Alfredo Rada, reported that the number of peasants killed in Porvenir had reached 30. “The magnitude of the massacre which took place in Porvenir surpassed that of the El Alto massacre in October, 2003, where there were 60 killed while in Porvenir the number approaches some thirty deaths. If a comparison is made between the population of El Alto and that of Pando, it will be evident that we are facing the most bloody slaughter in democratic times,” said Rada, at Palacio Quemado.

In a press conference, Rada indicated that Pando’s prefect, Leopoldo Fernández, is mainly responsible for last Thursday’s massacre. “Today we’ve confirmed another 10 deaths,” he indicated and added that this act would not remain unpunished, “it should be dealt with by the first power of the state, the Congress.”

The government fears that the death toll will grow with each passing day, and has demanded that the national Congress begin an investigation into the bloodiest genocide of recent times in Bolivia.

According to constituent Veimar Becerra, the figure could be higher. “According to my calculations, I who am familiar with the place, there are around 70 dead,” he told the Erbol Network. He said that “the accounts I collected indicated that they were practically stabbed like animals, including those killed in the Tahuamanu river, when many people threw themselves into the river and tried to flee.”

It’s not a movie, it’s the truth: there were children, women, we don’t know how many were killed, the attack, the ambush began at 10 and went on until 5 in the afternoon. I got away because I hid in the bushes,” a survivor of the Porvenir massacre told the Erbol Network.

(Translated by Machetera, Republished from Tlaxcala)

Evo Morales confronts the right wing's rebellion

Roger Burbach

(Source : Boliva Rising Blog - http://boliviarising.blogspot.com/2008/09/confronting-right-wing-rebellion.html )


[Roger Burbach is Director of the Center for the Study of the Americas (CENSA) based in Berkeley, CA. He has written extensively on Latin America and is the author of “The Pinochet Affair: State Terrorism and Global Justice.”]


As Bolivia teeters on the brink of civil war, President Evo Morales staunchly maintains his commitment to constructing a popular democracy by working within the state institutions that brought him to power. The show down with the right wing is taking place against the backdrop of the thirty-fifth anniversary of the overthrow of Salvador Allende, the heroic if tragic president of Chile who believed that the formal democratic state he inherited could be peacefully transformed to usher in a socialist society.

Like Allende, Morales faces a powerful economic and political elite aligned with the United States that is bent on reversing the limited reforms he has been able to implement during his nearly three years in power. Early on, Morales -- Bolivia’s first indigenous president -- moved assertively to exert greater control over the natural gas and oil resources of the country, sharply increasing the hydro-carbon tax, and then using a large portion of this revenue to provide a universal pension to all those over sixty years old, most of whom live in poverty and are indigenous.

The self-proclaimed Civic Committees in Media Luna (Half Moon) -- Bolivia’s four eastern departments -- have orchestrated a rebellion against these changes, demanding departmental autonomy and control of the hydro-carbon revenues, as well as an end to agrarian reform and even control of the police forces. The Santa Cruz Civic Committee, dominated by agro-industrial interests, is supporting the Cruceño Youth Union (UJC), an affiliated group that acts as a para-military organization, seizing and fire bombing government offices, and attacking Indian and peasant organizations that dare to support the national government.

Morales’ efforts to transform the institutions of the country have focused on the popularly elected Constituent Assembly to draft a new constitution. The assembly was convened in mid 2006 with representatives from Morales’ political party, the Movement Towards Socialism (MAS) holding 54 percent of the seats. In the drafting of the new constitution, the right wing political parties, led by Podemos (We Can), insisted that a two-thirds vote was needed even for the working committees to approve the different sections of the constitution. When they were overruled and a new constitution was close to being approved in November, 2007, members of the assembly, including its indigenous president, Silvia Lazarte, were assaulted in the streets of Sucre, the old nineteenth century capital where the assembly was being held.

Using words that evoked Allende’s last stand in the Chilean presidential palace, Evo Morales declared “dead or alive, I will have a new constitution for the country.” He quartered the assembly in an old castle under military protection where it adopted a constitution that has to be approved in a national referendum. Labeling Morales a “dictator,” the civic committees and the departmental prefects (governors) of Media Luna were able to stall the vote on the referendum, and instead organized departmental referendums for autonomy in May of this year that were ruled unconstitutional by the National Electoral Council.

Taking recourse in democracy rather than force, and searching for a national consensus, Morales then held up the vote on the new constitution, and instead put his presidency on the line in a recall referendum in which his mandate as well as that of the prefects of the departments could be revoked. On August 10, voters went to the polls and Morales won a resounding 67 percent of the vote, receiving a majority of the ballots in 95 of the country’s 112 districts with even the Media Luna department of Pando voting in his favor.

However, the insurgent prefects also had their mandates renewed. Based on the illegal, departmental plebiscites held in May, they moved to take control of Santa Cruz, the richest department. UJC shock troops roamed the streets of the city and surrounding towns, attacking and repressing any opposition by local indigenous movements and MAS-allied forces. Not wanting to provoke an outright rebellion, Evo Morales did not deploy the army or use the local police, leaving the urban area under the effective control of the UJC.

Simultaneously, the right wing--led by the Santa Cruz Civic Committee--began sewing economic instability, seeking to destabilize the Morales government much like the CIA-backed opposition did in Chile against Salvador Allende in the early 1970s. As in Chile, the rural business elites and allied truckers engaged in “strikes,” withholding or refusing to ship produce to the urban markets in the western Andes where the Indian population is concentrated, while selling commodities on the black market at high prices. The Confederation of Private Businesses of Bolivia called for a national producers’ shutdown if the government refused “to change its economic policies.”

The social movements allied with the government have mobilized against this right wing offensive. In the Media Luna, a union coalition of indigenous peoples and peasants campaigned against voting in the autonomy referendums, and have taken on the bands of the UJC as they try to intimidate and terrorize people. In the Andean highlands, the social movements descended on the capital La Paz in demonstrations backing the Morales’ government, including a large mobilization in June that stormed the American embassy because of its support for the right wing. In July, the federation of coca growers in the Chapare, where US anti-drug operations are centered, expelled the US Agency for International Development.

This past week the Civic Committees stepped up their efforts to take control of the Media Luna departments. In Santa Cruz on September 8, crowds of youth lead by the UJC seized government offices, including the land reform office, the tax office, state TV studios, the nationalized telephone company Entel, and set fire to the offices of a non-governmental human rights organization that promotes indigenous rights and provides legal advice. The military police, who had been dispatched to protect many of these offices, were forced to retreat, at times experiencing bloody blows that they were forbidden from responding to due to standing orders from La Paz not to use their weapons. The commanding general of the military police, while angrily denouncing the violent demonstrators, said that the military could take no action unless Evo Morales signed a degree authorizing the use of firearms.

What was in effect occurring was a struggle between Morales and the military over who would assume ultimate responsibility for the fighting and deaths that would ensue with a military intervention in Media Luna. The armed forces do not support the autonomous rebellion because it threatens the geographic integrity of the Bolivian nation. Yet they are reluctant to intervene because under past governments, when they fired on and killed demonstrators in the streets of La Paz, they were blamed for the bloodshed.

On September 10, as violence intensified throughout Media Luna, Evo Morales expelled US ambassador Philip Goldberg for “conspiring against democracy.” The month before, Goldberg had met with the prefect of Santa Cruz, Ruben Costas, who subsequently declared himself “governor” of the autonomous department and ordered the formal take over of government offices--including those collecting tax revenues. Costas is the principal leader of the rebellious prefects, and the main antagonist of Evo Morales.

September 11, the 35th anniversary of the coup against Allende, was the bloodiest day in the escalating conflict. In the Media Luna department of Pando, a para-military band with machine guns attacked the Indian community of El Porvenir, near the departmental capital of El Cobija, resulting in the death of at least 28 people. In a separate action, three policemen were kidnapped. The Red Ponchos, an official militia reserve unit of Indians loyal to Evo Morales, mobilized its forces to help the indigenous communities organize their self defense.

The next day Morales declared a state of siege in Pando and dispatched the army to move on Cobija and to retake its airport that had been occupied by right wing forces. Army units are also being sent to guard the natural gas oleoducts, one of which had been seized by the UJC, cutting the flow of gas to neighboring Brazil and Argentina. General Luis Trigo Antelo, the commander in chief of the Bolivian Armed Forces declared: “We will not tolerate any more actions by radical groups that are provoking a confrontation among Bolivians, causing pain and suffering and threatening the national security.” In signing the order authorizing the use of force in Pando, Morales stated that he felt responsible for the humiliation of the military and the police by radicals and vandals because he had not authorized them to use their weapons. This was the quid pro quo for getting the military high command to act.

After sustained fighting with at least three dead, the army took control of the airport and moved on the city. An order for the arrest of the prefect of Pando was issued for refusing to recognize the state of siege and for being responsible for the massacre in El Porvenir. In Santa Cruz, the police arrested 8 rioters of the UJC. Peasant organizations have announced they will march on the city to retake control of the government offices. The dissident prefects, led by Costas, are still demanding departmental autonomy and refusing to accept a national vote on the referendum for the new constitution.

Evo Morales refuses to back down, declaring in a meeting with supportive union leaders, “we will launch a campaign to approve the new constitution.” He did, however, indicate he may modify the draft to accommodate some of the demands for autonomy by the prefects. Like Allende, Morales continues to search for a democratic solution to the crisis in his country. For the moment, he has the backing of the Bolivian armed forces along with overwhelming popular support, thereby avoiding the ultimate fate of the Chilean president.


2008/9/4

走過20年,中時工會決定與其放爛工會不如光榮解散

蘇雅婷
前中時工會總幹
〔來源:台灣苦勞網: http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/26193〕


中國時報產業工會繼7月17日罷工投票以五票之差被否決後,8月27日再召開一次會員大會,以119票絕對多數通過自明(98)年一月一日起將工會解散。這兩次會員大會,工會徹底面對打罷工集體戰條件已不再,再加上主力會員流失嚴重,變成花瓶工會甚至資方工會的隱憂甚深,因此決定讓會員共同決定工會存廢。

8月27日當天,應出席人數為187人,至會議結束止親自出席有141人,出席率高達75%,其中高雄印刷廠就來了26人,僅3位有要事未能出席,已關廠的台中印刷廠也來了11人,3位不克前來。這次大會,工會將它定位為內部討論,沒有邀資方,也沒有邀上級工會等友會及工運團體,但報到時,資方勞資關係室主任崔盛國還是不請自來,顯見罷工案雖然失敗,資方對工會一舉一動仍戒慎小心、仔細觀察。

大會一開始主席史忠勇直接向會員揭露大裁員讓工會嚴重損兵折將,會員從187人減為137人,50人被資遣,12位理監事中就少7位,其中3位常務理事及常務監事也將離職,除了誰來接棒領導工會戰鬥外,年底再一波裁員也會讓工會縮減為80人,希望會員好好面對工會的去留。

顧問:我們還要堅持當初的戰鬥工會嗎?
工會顧問鄭村棋直接從三個層次分析工會不得不面對的現實,第一、當年戰鬥工會創會精神還能不能維持?第二、工會的性質要不要改變?工會並不是不能轉變為勞資橋樑工會和花瓶工會,但要先談清楚。第三、問自己:「我的利益是什麼?」「工會可保護我的利益嗎?」

鄭村棋以聯合報工會為例,說他早期曾是聯合報工會顧問,但當工會性質轉變時他便辭去顧問。當民生報停刊時,剛接工會理事長的徐國淦曾找他幫忙,透露自己跟資方協商完資遣條件時,資方竟詫異地問「就這樣而已喔?」徐國淦這時才知道原來過去勞資雙方會交換一套默契,例如資方原要給的條件是加發2.5個月,但工會幹部會跟資方說你只要宣布1.5個月就好,等工會跟你要求時,再宣布發2.5個月,也就是面子給工會,裡子給資方,鄭村棋稱讚徐國淦是還不錯的工會幹部,敢直接拒絕再扮演這種角色。其他如台塑工會爭年終獎金時,也一樣會演出類似戲碼,他用此證明工會的存在不必然表示會保護工人利益,還要看工會的性質是什麼。致辭結束後鄭村棋即離開會場,交由大會繼續討論這個嚴肅的問題。

接著,大會放映由郭明珠全程跟拍剪接的大裁員抗爭紀錄片,影片清楚呈現工會起兵再戰、工會罷工就差五票到中廠弟兄關廠的落寞。

幹部:五大危機難以維持戰鬥路線,不要讓工會變成空殼工會
常務理事徐幹魁清楚地以投影片方式分析工會面臨的五大困境,包括:一、工會幹部流失九成,二、會員人數減少搭便車者的比例漸增,三、財務困難,四、基層小組組織崩解,五、在職會員參與率低,從可戰鬥變成只能看資方臉色協商的窘境。

徐幹魁說,理事會認為目前已是戰鬥工會的最小規模,不希望它未來變成空殼工會,所以提出兩個討論案,一為提高會費同時徵詢會員出來接任理監事的意願,另一則是將工會解散。理監事負責任的態度是主張解散工會;但是仍然開放空間給會員兩案同時討論決定。

討論一開始,同樣提案主張解散工會的高雄廠會員發言說明,當初高雄廠並非裁員單位,但是全廠會員支持罷工,一路過程中看到北部會員的冷漠,包括每次開會都是夜間工作、最遠的高雄廠會員來的最早又最多。他很愛這個工會,也希望工會存在,但是如果會員不願將會員調高到1000元,繼續維持戰鬥工會,他會忍痛決定解散工會。

工商編輯部會員也表示自己固然希望工會存在,在聯合報系工作時也加入工會,卻不曾見過工會理監事,更不曾知道工會開會的任何訊息。如果中時工會未來變成跟聯合報一樣,他會支持解散工會。

會員:伸頭一刀縮頭一刀,痛快作決定吧
另一名經歷中晚裁撤和618大裁員的編輯會員指出工會繼續存在兩大問題:工會目前實力沒有辦法爭取到區分會員、非會員權益的差別,未來更多非會員等著搭便車,不會有人願意加入工會。而編輯部的白領會員,「愛面子又龜毛」、「秀才造反三年不成」,若沒有「戰鬥型幹部」,贊成解散工會。

當要決定以多少比例決定工會解散時,有位即將離職的會員認為將離職者來決定工會去留立場尷尬,所以提案希望離職者迴避,僅由留任會員決定,但他的發言隨即引發坐在他身旁「留任」會員反彈,認為大家都是會員,不該剝奪別人的決定權。

主席史忠勇以及工會常務理事徐中元多次邀請九月一日之後留任報社會員,及支持工會繼續存在的會員發言,但是現場無人提出意見,最後,民權廠會員表示:這是重大的議案,就是依工會章程處理,「伸頭是一刀,縮頭也是一刀,大家痛快一點,不要再發生差五票的事情了」,罷工投票的五票之恨仍然是熱心會員的心中之痛。

結果:119票贊成工會解散
主席當場宣布會員報到數為127人,會員先以表決通過以二分之一多數決決定工會解散,再以119票贊成,超過出席九成通過工會解散,解散日就訂在明年一月一日。

大會也通過88萬元保留款用作陳文賢被非法資遣和工輿毀謗訴訟兩案之相關費用,並選任清算人負責解散後管理該筆基金。

走過20年,中時工會並不是頭一次面對自己的存廢,每當工會因資方壓力遭遇挫敗或工會結構不得不轉型時,都會負責任地和會員面對到底還要不要這個工會,想方設法突破工會經營困境。

這次,中國時報突然縮小規模,以「去蕪存菁」、「籠絡菁英」的姿態,讓撿排及印務藍領當道的時代提早集體結束;中時工會結束象徵的也是解嚴20年藍領及中高齡工會世代的結束,媒體產業趨向菁英化的新勞動型態正在開始,要走向什麼勞資關係,將是這些白領文化菁英所要面對的新課題。

中國時報產業工會 解散聲明

解散聲明
中國時報產業工會


7月17日工會舉行罷工投票,結果以5票之差罷工未能過案。工會唯一有效的抗爭行動做不出來之後,理事會必須負責任的把工會未來的可能發展向會員說明,並讓會員清清楚楚的做選擇、做決定。

8月27日的會員大會,會員以119票贊成,高於出席九成人數通過自98年1月1日起解散工會。

工會從民國77年9月4日成立至今一直自詡是個戰鬥工會,不是勞資的橋樑、也不是資方的傳聲筒。當年工會籌組時,曾發生勞方與資方激烈的爭取籌備委員,在付出三位工會核心發起人被解雇慘痛代價後,勞方終於取得工會的自主權,也奠定以藍領工人為主力的工會性質。

時報由盛而衰,員工從4000人裁減至今僅剩700餘人,未來留用目標是3、4百人。工會會員從全盛的1300多人到大裁員後僅剩137人,年底預估將被裁減至80人。理事會認真面對幹部流失九成、會員人數驟減、財務困難、主力會員流失、從可戰鬥變只能看資方臉色協商等的五大困境,分析過去雖然入會率只有三分之一,但靠著藍領工人有籌碼、有行動力,便足以捍衛自己工作權。但大裁員過後,留下的會員結構已變成以編輯部、業務單位和沒打過仗又年輕的民權印刷廠為主力,這些人參與工會向來消極,但面對日益強大的資方,當年創會精神恐怕難以為繼。

這次抗爭也讓工會清楚面對擴大吸收會員無望,因為當工會以專案降低入會費的方式召喚非會員入會齊抗爭時,新入會的55人當中,47位出自印刷廠、7位來自分類廣告,但裁員首當其衝的編輯部竟只有1位白領記者填入會單。目前500多名不加入工會者,大多數人還是盤算搭工會便車,尤其編輯部被留用的「菁英」工作者更不會以工會集體作為其生存之道。

如果要維持一個戰鬥工會,多數會員們必須有戰鬥力、需付出更多代價維持工會,並且願意擔任工會的戰鬥幹部。如果上述的條件不存在,會員也必須面對戰鬥工會的性質必須改變成花瓶工會的現實,要清楚做選擇。所以理事會分別就工會去留提出「提高會費」和「解散工會」兩個討論案,解散案最後以119票、高達出席大會會員九成以上的票數通過自98年1月1日起解散。

工會成立至今走過20年,今天我們親自解散這個我們熱愛的工會,仍是以一個戰鬥工會的身份來解散它,這是會員們的光榮與尊嚴:20年來,從創會到現在,我們一路自主、一路戰鬥、我們一貫,看清無力戰鬥時自行決定解散,這是鬥士們忍痛但卻最英勇的決定。

中時工會沒有了,不代表中時未來就沒有工會,也不代表工會的會員就此散去,未來的路還長,組織的形式可以很寬廣。

我們感謝這20年來會員的支持與參與,感謝所有投注時間、心力、熱情支撐這個工會的人,也感謝在我們有難時一直協助相挺的工會友會及工運團體。

非常感謝。

中國時報產業工會
Venezuela: Second wave of nationalisations launched
Federico Fuentes
Correspondent in Caracas, Venezuela
Green Left Weekly, Australia
[ Green Left Weekly issue #765 ]

September 3, 2008 -- On August 27, Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez announced the end of negotiations with former owner Ternium over the nationalisation of the Sidor steel factory, stating that the government would "take over all the companies that it has here", and that Ternium "can leave". Speaking during a televised broadcast, Chavez explained that Ternium "did not recognise our sovereignty".

"The deadline for reaching an agreement has expired. We will move ahead and pay them what it really costs. Moreover, it will not be all in one go as they wanted. No, we will pay them at a pace that is appropriate for us."

Until the April 9 decision to nationalise Sidor, the Ternium consortium, whose biggest shareholder is the Italian-Argentine transnational Techint, had 60% control of one of the largest steel factories in Latin America, located in the industrial state of Bolivar.

Chavez stated in his August 27 broadcast that a tentative agreement on the purchase price, reached the previous week, had broken down when Ternium tried to impose unacceptable conditions. Among the transnational's demands was a law giving it immunity from any future lawsuits related to abuses committed by Ternium against the Sidor workforce.

The decision to nationalise Sidor came after a 15-month dispute between the workers and the transnational over a collective contract. Having intervened in order to help reach a resolution, Venezuela's vice-president, Ramon Carrizalez, declared that negotiations with Sidor's management were no longer possible, due to its "coloniser attitude" and "barbarous exploitation".

"This is a government that protects workers and will never take the side of a transnational company", Carrizalez said.

Nationalisation push
During the August 27 broadcast, Chavez stood alongside business owners from the cement industry, with whom the government has also been negotiating since the April 3 announcement that it plans to nationalise the three largest cement companies, which control 90% of the sector.

The government had reached agreements to buy out the majority of shares from the French company, Lafarge, and the Swiss company, Holcim, but negotiations had stalled with the largest company, the Mexican-owned Cemex.

On August 18, after the negotiation period expired, the government announced that it would expropriate Cemex, and ordered the takeover of its installations.

By law, there is a 60-day period starting from the declaration of intent to expropriate during which the two parties can reach an agreement. Cemex is asking for US$1.3 billion, but the government has stated it will not pay more than $650 million.

However, Chavez said that, in contrast to the record with Ternium, there were positive signs that an agreement could be reached.

Chavez also used the broadcast to explain a new law, approved in the first round of discussion by the National Assembly, that will put the distribution of fuel back into government hands. The state oil company PDVSA will supply fuel directly to the 60% of the country's service stations that are privately owned (many by small proprietors), eliminating the capitalist intermediaries who now sell to them for a profit.

Negotiations will now begin with the seven largest companies, including Texaco and BP, and 650 other firms that currently finance a majority of private service stations. Energy minister Rafael Ramirez also announced that the government was looking at similar measures regarding the distribution of Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) cylinders.

Last month, Chavez announced plans to nationalise Spanish-owned Banco de Venezuela, an action that will almost double the state's control of the financial sector from its previous 10%.

Reversing neoliberalism
Together with the announcements made earlier this year to take control of more than 30% of milk production and food distribution, and last year's decision to take majority control of the oilfields in the Orinoco Belt, these moves are part of a second wave of nationalisations, focused on industries related to production.

The first wave, begun at the start of 2007, was directed at telecommunications and electricity, to guarantee all Venezuelans access to basic services.

The August 25 edition of the Caracas daily El Universal reported that since last year 11 industries have passed into state hands.

While pro-capitalist governments privatised a number of important industries during the 1990s (including Sidor, part of the electrical sector and telecommunications company CANTV), they always had their eyes set on the big prize, PDVSA. Chavez's election in 1998 halted that privatisation plan. Since then the government, backed by the majority of the population, has worked towards rolling back neoliberalism.

Unsurprisingly, the first major showdown was a result of government attempts to gain full control over the nominally state-owned PDVSA. Fierce resistance by the parasitic capitalist class, accustomed to leeching off the rent produced by PDVSA, led to a military coup that briefly overthrew Chavez in April 2002 followed by a shutdown of the oil industry by the pro-capitalist management in December 2002.

Both attempts by the capitalist class to bring down Chavez were carried out in alliance with the corrupt trade union bureaucracy of the Confederation of Venezuelan Workers (CTV).

During more than two months of intense struggle caused by the shutdown, oil workers, working alongside poor communities and the armed forces, reopened PDVSA and restarted it under workers' control.

This victory was crucial in ensuring that the government could begin to redirect PDVSA's profits away from the capitalists and towards funding the social missions that provide, among other things, free health care and education. The missions also helped organise the Chavista grassroots supporters.

Publicly declaring in January 2005 that he had become convinced that his project for national liberation and the eradication of poverty could not be achieved within the bounds of capitalism, Chavez argued for the need to move towards a "new socialism of the 21st century".

That same month, he announced the nationalisation of the Venepal paper company, whose workers had been fighting to reopen it after the bosses shut down operations in December 2002. Renamed Invepal, the company was handed over to the workers as a joint state-worker cooperative. Since then, a number of other smaller companies that had been shut down and then taken-over by their workers have been nationalised.

However, the nationalisations initiated in 2007 marked a qualitative leap in the process of state recuperation of control over strategic sectors.

State planning
These nationalisations have been carried out in accordance with the government's overall economic plan, which seeks state control over strategic industries in order to direct production towards the needs of the Venezuelan nation.

Now under state control, the three cement companies will be merged into the new National Cement Corporation and will integrate its production plans with PDVSA and Sidor — focusing on infrastructure development, creating new industrial centres and pushing forward the government's badly needed housing construction plans.

The Steel Corporation of Venezuela is also being created — it will manage the whole steel production chain that is now 80% under state control, from primary material to finished products. Production will be directed towards the needs of small and medium companies, the oil industry and the housing sector.

And, while no specific public statements have been made, it seems likely that the nationalisation of Banco de Venezuela will lead to reorganisation of the public banking sector into a single national public bank.

The new Public Administration Law, decreed on July 29 as part of the package of 26 laws issued by Chavez, states that where various state companies exist they should be grouped into one. This can include companies in different industrial sectors that, due to their nature, work together.

With the recent nationalisations, the number of workers in the state sector will increase by 41,400 to just over 2 million, according to the National Institute of Statistics. This does not include those in the fuel distribution and LPG cylinder distribution sectors, which are slated to come under state control.

This represents a 53.5% increase in the number of public sector workers in the last nine years. Importantly, Chavez has raised the need to eradicate the practice of contracting out labour in the state sector, which will further increase this number.

In the same period, employment in the (formal and informal) private sector grew from 7.3 million to 9.4 million.

Worker and community participation
Almost none of the recent nationalisations are the direct result of workers' struggles in favour of such measures, although in many cases labour disputes were factors. This was the case with fuel distribution, where unions have been warning that the bosses were trying to manufacture shortages and provoke strikes to undermine the government.

In contrast to most of the earlier nationalisations involving small factories, only in Sidor can it be said that the demand for nationalisation came from the workers. Even then, the demand was raised only in the last period of the struggle after persistent campaigning by a small nucleus of Sidor workers.

Yet, the future of the nationalised companies depends on the political and organisational capacity of the working class in running these industries, and the working class currently finds itself in a state of dispersion and fragmentation.

Unofficially, according to the daily newspaper Ultimas Noticias (April 27), there are no fewer than 3600 unions in Venezuela. This fragmentation is due to numerous factors, but two in particular stand out. First, with the coming to power of Chavez and the expansion of workers' rights and union freedom, workplaces across the country experienced an explosion of union organising.

In the aftermath of the defeat of the bosses' lockout, a majority of the pro-revolution unions came behind the formation of the National Union of Workers (UNT), which rapidly overtook the CTV as the largest union federation. However, the UNT is plagued by bitter internal disputes. These divisions deepened earlier this year when two currents left the UNT to form a new union federation.

Added to this are negative experiences in some cooperative-run factories, including the exploitation of contract labour and self-enrichment by co-op owners.

Second, actions by sections of the government and state bureaucracy have also worked against the self-organisation of workers and their participation in running state industries. Under the previous labour minister, Jose Ramon Rivero (who actively worked against the Sidor workers), parallel unionism was promoted in order to favour the union current from which he came and to dampen labour disputes.

In PDVSA and the state electrical company, workers have faced attacks at the hands of a bureaucracy that is afraid of losing power if workers take on a greater role in management.

The recent nationalisations have coincided with the launch of the "April 13 Mission". Chavez has stated that part of the mission's aim is to transfer control over services to organised communities through communal councils and communes, and the creation of productive units and factories that will be socially owned and run.

Without the participation of workers and organised communities in the running of industries and in democratic planning, control of state companies will remain in the hands of bureaucrats who are more interested in maintaining their share of power and privileges. This would restrict the ability of workers to fully develop their creative potential, boxing them into their role as simple providers of labour power.

This has created situations like the one in the nationalised Inveval valve factory, run under workers' management. It has the capacity to produce valves for PDVSA, but it has been pushed aside by PDVSA bureaucrats who prefer to continue their contracts with private companies.

Significantly, it was reported on August 28 that Inveval will become a mixed company, jointly owned with PDVSA, and will directly supply the state oil company with valves.

A crisis threatens the electrical sector, where, despite repeated warnings by the workers, power generation and distribution plans have failed to take into consideration increased demand caused by the boom in industrial and housing projects.

Speaking on the eve of this year's May Day demonstrations, Chavez once again repeated his call for the working class to take the lead in the struggle for socialism. "There is no revolution without the workers, and I would add, there is no socialism without the working class", he insisted. "That is why the working class that the revolution needs has to be very conscious, very united", he said.

"The Bolivarian revolution … needs to be ‘proletarianised' … the ideology of the proletariat should dominate in all spheres, a transformational, truly revolutionary ideology, and overcome petty bourgeois currents that always end up being … counter-revolutionary".

2008/9/3

Venezuela - Second wave of nationalisations launched

Federico Fuentes
Correspondent in Caracas, Venezuela
Green Left Weekly, Australia


September 3, 2008 -- On August 27, Venezuela's President Hugo Chávez announced the end of negotiations with former owner Ternium over the nationalisation of the Sidor steel factory, stating that the government would “take over all the companies that it has here”, and that Ternium “can leave”. Speaking during a televised broadcast, Chávez explained that Ternium “did not recognise our sovereignty”.

“The deadline for reaching an agreement has expired. We will move ahead and pay them what it really costs. Moreover, it will not be all in one go as they wanted. No, we will pay them at a pace that is appropriate for us.”

Until the April 9 decision to nationalise Sidor, the Ternium consortium, whose biggest shareholder is the Italian-Argentine transnational Techint, had 60% control of one of the largest steel factories in Latin America, located in the industrial state of Bolívar.

Chávez stated in his August 27 broadcast that a tentative agreement on the purchase price, reached the previous week, had broken down when Ternium tried to impose unacceptable conditions. Among the transnational’s demands was a law giving it immunity from any future lawsuits related to abuses committed by Ternium against the Sidor workforce.

The decision to nationalise Sidor came after a 15-month dispute between the workers and the transnational over a collective contract. Having intervened in order to help reach a resolution, Venezuela's vice-president, Ramon Carrizalez, declared that negotiations with Sidor’s management were no longer possible, due to its “coloniser attitude” and “barbarous exploitation”.

“This is a government that protects workers and will never take the side of a transnational company”, Carrizalez said.

Nationalisation push

During the August 27 broadcast, Chávez stood alongside business owners from the cement industry, with whom the government has also been negotiating since the April 3 announcement that it plans to nationalise the three largest cement companies, which control 90% of the sector.

The government had reached agreements to buy out the majority of shares from the French company, Lafarge, and the Swiss company, Holcim, but negotiations had stalled with the largest company, the Mexican-owned Cemex.

On August 18, after the negotiation period expired, the government announced that it would expropriate Cemex, and ordered the takeover of its installations.

By law, there is a 60-day period starting from the declaration of intent to expropriate during which the two parties can reach an agreement. Cemex is asking for US$1.3 billion, but the government has stated it will not pay more than $650 million.

However, Chávez said that, in contrast to the record with Ternium, there were positive signs that an agreement could be reached.

Chávez also used the broadcast to explain a new law, approved in the first round of discussion by the National Assembly, that will put the distribution of fuel back into government hands. The state oil company PDVSA will supply fuel directly to the 60% of the country’s service stations that are privately owned (many by small proprietors), eliminating the capitalist intermediaries who now sell to them for a profit.

Negotiations will now begin with the seven largest companies, including Texaco and BP, and 650 other firms that currently finance a majority of private service stations. Energy minister Rafael Ramírez also announced that the government was looking at similar measures regarding the distribution of Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) cylinders.

Last month, Chávez announced plans to nationalise Spanish-owned Banco de Venezuela, an action that will almost double the state’s control of the financial sector from its previous 10%.

Reversing neoliberalism

Together with the announcements made earlier this year to take control of more than 30% of milk production and food distribution, and last year’s decision to take majority control of the oilfields in the Orinoco Belt, these moves are part of a second wave of nationalisations, focused on industries related to production.

The first wave, begun at the start of 2007, was directed at telecommunications and electricity, to guarantee all Venezuelans access to basic services.

The August 25 edition of the Caracas daily El Universal reported that since last year 11 industries have passed into state hands.

While pro-capitalist governments privatised a number of important industries during the 1990s (including Sidor, part of the electrical sector and telecommunications company CANTV), they always had their eyes set on the big prize, PDVSA. Chávez’s election in 1998 halted that privatisation plan. Since then the government, backed by the majority of the population, has worked towards rolling back neoliberalism.

Unsurprisingly, the first major showdown was a result of government attempts to gain full control over the nominally state-owned PDVSA. Fierce resistance by the parasitic capitalist class, accustomed to leeching off the rent produced by PDVSA, led to a military coup that briefly overthrew Chávez in April 2002 followed by a shutdown of the oil industry by the pro-capitalist management in December 2002.

Both attempts by the capitalist class to bring down Chávez were carried out in alliance with the corrupt trade union bureaucracy of the Confederation of Venezuelan Workers (CTV).

During more than two months of intense struggle caused by the shutdown, oil workers, working alongside poor communities and the armed forces, reopened PDVSA and restarted it under workers’ control.

This victory was crucial in ensuring that the government could begin to redirect PDVSA’s profits away from the capitalists and towards funding the social missions that provide, among other things, free health care and education. The missions also helped organise the Chavista grassroots supporters.

Publicly declaring in January 2005 that he had become convinced that his project for national liberation and the eradication of poverty could not be achieved within the bounds of capitalism, Chávez argued for the need to move towards a “new socialism of the 21st century”.

That same month, he announced the nationalisation of the Venepal paper company, whose workers had been fighting to reopen it after the bosses shut down operations in December 2002. Renamed Invepal, the company was handed over to the workers as a joint state-worker cooperative. Since then, a number of other smaller companies that had been shut down and then taken-over by their workers have been nationalised.

However, the nationalisations initiated in 2007 marked a qualitative leap in the process of state recuperation of control over strategic sectors.

State planning

These nationalisations have been carried out in accordance with the government’s overall economic plan, which seeks state control over strategic industries in order to direct production towards the needs of the Venezuelan nation.

Now under state control, the three cement companies will be merged into the new National Cement Corporation and will integrate its production plans with PDVSA and Sidor — focusing on infrastructure development, creating new industrial centres and pushing forward the government’s badly needed housing construction plans.

The Steel Corporation of Venezuela is also being created — it will manage the whole steel production chain that is now 80% under state control, from primary material to finished products. Production will be directed towards the needs of small and medium companies, the oil industry and the housing sector.

And, while no specific public statements have been made, it seems likely that the nationalisation of Banco de Venezuela will lead to reorganisation of the public banking sector into a single national public bank.

The new Public Administration Law, decreed on July 29 as part of the package of 26 laws issued by Chávez, states that where various state companies exist they should be grouped into one. This can include companies in different industrial sectors that, due to their nature, work together.

With the recent nationalisations, the number of workers in the state sector will increase by 41,400 to just over 2 million, according to the National Institute of Statistics. This does not include those in the fuel distribution and LPG cylinder distribution sectors, which are slated to come under state control.

This represents a 53.5% increase in the number of public sector workers in the last nine years. Importantly, Chávez has raised the need to eradicate the practice of contracting out labour in the state sector, which will further increase this number.

In the same period, employment in the (formal and informal) private sector grew from 7.3 million to 9.4 million.

Worker and community participation

Almost none of the recent nationalisations are the direct result of workers’ struggles in favour of such measures, although in many cases labour disputes were factors. This was the case with fuel distribution, where unions have been warning that the bosses were trying to manufacture shortages and provoke strikes to undermine the government.

In contrast to most of the earlier nationalisations involving small factories, only in Sidor can it be said that the demand for nationalisation came from the workers. Even then, the demand was raised only in the last period of the struggle after persistent campaigning by a small nucleus of Sidor workers.

Yet, the future of the nationalised companies depends on the political and organisational capacity of the working class in running these industries, and the working class currently finds itself in a state of dispersion and fragmentation.

Unofficially, according to the daily newspaper Ultimas Noticias (April 27), there are no fewer than 3600 unions in Venezuela. This fragmentation is due to numerous factors, but two in particular stand out. First, with the coming to power of Chávez and the expansion of workers’ rights and union freedom, workplaces across the country experienced an explosion of union organising.

In the aftermath of the defeat of the bosses’ lockout, a majority of the pro-revolution unions came behind the formation of the National Union of Workers (UNT), which rapidly overtook the CTV as the largest union federation. However, the UNT is plagued by bitter internal disputes. These divisions deepened earlier this year when two currents left the UNT to form a new union federation.

Added to this are negative experiences in some cooperative-run factories, including the exploitation of contract labour and self-enrichment by co-op owners.

Second, actions by sections of the government and state bureaucracy have also worked against the self-organisation of workers and their participation in running state industries. Under the previous labour minister, José Ramón Rivero (who actively worked against the Sidor workers), parallel unionism was promoted in order to favour the union current from which he came and to dampen labour disputes.

In PDVSA and the state electrical company, workers have faced attacks at the hands of a bureaucracy that is afraid of losing power if workers take on a greater role in management.

The recent nationalisations have coincided with the launch of the “April 13 Mission”. Chávez has stated that part of the mission’s aim is to transfer control over services to organised communities through communal councils and communes, and the creation of productive units and factories that will be socially owned and run.

Without the participation of workers and organised communities in the running of industries and in democratic planning, control of state companies will remain in the hands of bureaucrats who are more interested in maintaining their share of power and privileges. This would restrict the ability of workers to fully develop their creative potential, boxing them into their role as simple providers of labour power.

This has created situations like the one in the nationalised Inveval valve factory, run under workers’ management. It has the capacity to produce valves for PDVSA, but it has been pushed aside by PDVSA bureaucrats who prefer to continue their contracts with private companies.

Significantly, it was reported on August 28 that Inveval will become a mixed company, jointly owned with PDVSA, and will directly supply the state oil company with valves.

A crisis threatens the electrical sector, where, despite repeated warnings by the workers, power generation and distribution plans have failed to take into consideration increased demand caused by the boom in industrial and housing projects.

Speaking on the eve of this year’s May Day demonstrations, Chávez once again repeated his call for the working class to take the lead in the struggle for socialism. “There is no revolution without the workers, and I would add, there is no socialism without the working class”, he insisted. “That is why the working class that the revolution needs has to be very conscious, very united”, he said.

“The Bolivarian revolution … needs to be ‘proletarianised’ … the ideology of the proletariat should dominate in all spheres, a transformational, truly revolutionary ideology, and overcome petty bourgeois currents that always end up being … counter-revolutionary”.